Recommendation
What the cognitive layer proposes and why.
HOW IT WORKS
From recommendation to accountable action.
AI can investigate and recommend. Organisations still need to decide what is authorised, by whom, under which conditions and with what path back to review.
THE DECISION MODEL
A recommendation enters the boundary. A governed intention leaves it.
The evidence snapshot, decision contract and authority are not later workflow steps. They converge at the decision.
Evidence + contract + authority
The organisation determines whether, what and who may decide.
Governed intent
An explicit, bounded and attributable instruction.
Action & review
Execution returns outcomes that may confirm or reopen the decision.
WHAT MAKES IT DIFFERENT
The difference is not more automation. It is governed organisational change.
Moves predefined work
Useful when the rules and authorised actions are already known.
Performs adaptive work
Useful for investigation, synthesis, planning and tool use.
Preserves the decision boundary
Needed when cognitive work can influence consequential organisational action.
THE MINIMUM BOUNDARY
Not everything needs to be a Cognitive Workflow System.
The Minimum Governed Decision Boundary is the smallest useful governance kernel: decision context, authority, scope, authorised action and review conditions.
When no cognitive work is involved, that boundary may be enough. A CWS becomes relevant when investigation, inference or recommendation must remain connected to the decision it informs.
Read the CWS thesisSTART WITH ONE DECISION
Which recommendation should no longer become action informally?
Bring the process, the current decision owner and the action that follows. We will help define the boundary first.